Cash Advance Company Cleo AI Agrees to Pay $17 Million As Result of FTC Lawsuit Charging It Deceives Consumers
FTC complaint charges that Cleo misleads consumers about amounts and timing of available cash advances and obstructs efforts to cancel subscriptions
Tags:
Consumer Protection
Bureau of Consumer Protection
deceptive/misleading conduct
Finance
Advertising and Marketing
Online Advertising and Marketing
Credit and Finance
Credit and Loans
FinTech
Online cash advance company Cleo AI has agreed to pay $17 million to settle the Federal Trade Commission’s allegations that the company deceived consumers about how much money they could get and how fast that money could be available. The complaint, filed in federal district court along with the proposed settlement order,also alleges that Cleo made it difficult for consumers to cancel Cleo’s subscription service.
“The Complaint lays out how Cleo misled consumers with promises of fast money, but consumers found they received much less than the advertised hundreds of dollars promised, had to pay more for same day delivery, and then had difficulty canceling,” said Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.
The complaint charges that:
Cleo’s ads promised consumers access to hundreds of dollars in cash advances, but almost no one received anything close to the advertised amounts.
Cleo’s ads promised consumers access to same-day or instant advances. In reality, subscribers had to pay an additional fee for this service. And even after paying the fee, they could have to wait until the next day for their money.
Cleo made it difficult for consumers to cancel subscriptions. Consumers said they were charged monthly fees despite repeated requests to cancel, and were told they could not cancel their subscription until outstanding cash advances were paid.