SE HABLA ESPAÑOL | MAP
312-739-4200
Contact Us

Contact Us

Archives

  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013

  • Areas & Topics

    Frquently Asked Questions

    Our Office Location

    Edelman, Combs, Latturner, & Goodwin, LLC

    20 South Clark Street
    Suite 1500
    Chicago, IL 60603

    info@edcombs.com
    Phone: 312-739-4200
    Fax: 312-419-0379


    E-mail Us  |  Chicago Law Office

    Edelman Combs Latturner Goodwin's facebook page   Edelman Combs Latturner Goodwin's Twitter Page   Edelman Combs Latturner Goodwin's Google Plus Page

    Complaint Alleges Debt Collection Practice Violates Privacy Law

    From Credit & Collection News:

    A string of 12 numbers visible on an envelope sent to collect a debt is a violation of federal privacy law, according to a proposed class action filed by a New Jersey plaintiff following a precedential ruling by the Third Circuit that held just that. Lakewood, N.J. plaintiff Yosaif Richter alleges in her complaint that the Pennsylvania law firm of Allan C. Smith, P.C., violated the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) by including her account number above her name and address on an Aug. 10 letter attempting to collect a $3,630.11 debt Richter allegedly owed to a third party. Richter contends that the visible account number serves to potentially identify her as a debtor, which would violate the FDCPA’s provision prohibiting a debt collector from using any language or symbol, other than the debt collector’s name and address, on an envelope to guard the financial privacy of the recipient, according to the complaint in Richter v. Smith, filed Nov. 18 in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The plaintiff identifies the potential class as consumers with accounts at HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. and its affiliates in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania who received similar debt collection letters. The complaint requests damages and declaratory relief. The complaint cites the Aug. 28 ruling of a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Douglas v. Convergent Outsourcing. The court found an account number on such an envelope is not a “meaningless” string of numbers, but instead private information that Congress intended the statute to screen from public view.